Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. Fisher

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1906PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Mineral County. Action by Edward Kuykendall, by his next friend, against Harry G. Fisher, administrator. Judgment for plaintiff, and •defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

POFEENBARGER, JUDGE:

A writ of error to the circuit court of Mineral county has brought here, for review, a judgment in favor of Edward Kuykendall, an infant, suing by his next friend, against Harry C. Fisher, as administrator of the estate of Ellen Hughes, deceased, rendered by that court on an appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace, in whose court the action originated.

As the rulings complained of relate to the rejection of ■evidence offered and instructions given and refused, a statement of the principal facts and the nature of the case, with reference, to some of the evidence, is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Parkersburg Industrial Co. v. SchultzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cox v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Parker v. National Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Abney v. Kingsland & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1846

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Foulke v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Hollen v. LingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hollen v. LingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API