Legal Opinion

Farmers' National Bank v. Van Slyke

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1888Published

Motion for new trial by the defendant Snyder, on exceptions ordered to be heard at the General Term in the first instance after a trial at the Cattaraugus Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Haight,' J.:

Tbis action was brought to recover tbe amount of two promissory notes, made by tbe defendant Yan Slyke and indorsed by tbe defendant Snyder. Tbe evidence taken upon tbe trial tends to show that tbe plaintiff was tbe bolder of four notes made by tbe defendant Yan Slyke, amounting to tbe sum of $664. That upon each note there was tbe name of an indorser, which turned out to be forged. That tbe officers of the plaintiff’s bank, after learning of tbe fact that tbe names of tbe indorsers were forged, investigated tbe financial condition of tbe defendant Yan Slyke and found him to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. . Van VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Farrington v. Frankfort BankNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Stewart v. SmallNew York Supreme Court · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API