Legal Opinion

United Waste Manufacturing Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1914PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Action to recover under a policy of indemnity insurance. Trial had before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtRudd, J.

This action is brought to recover under a policy of indemnity insurance issued to the plaintiff by the defendant. The recovery sought is $1,700, with interest. The amount is made up of $1,450 paid by the plaintiff in settlement of two actions for personal injuries brought against it because of the injury of Peter Maloney, an infant, who had been in the employ *541of the United Waste Manufacturing Company, and the further sum of $250 which the plaintiff claims to have paid as counsel fees in connection with the settlement of the said cases.

The policy of indemnity issued by the defendant contained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koester v. . Rochester Candy WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Buffalo Steel Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Buffalo Steel Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. HilderbrandtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. Smith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Leonard v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. Brodek v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API