Legal Opinion

Ehrlich v. Pike

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to set aside and vacate the award made by arbitrators.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

In February, 1896, Sol Ehrlich, the plaintiff, and Annie Pike, the defendant, agreed to form a -copartnership under the name of A. Pike & Co., and entered into articles by which the plaintiff was to receive one-third and the defendant two-thirds of the profits of their future transactions. In February, 1902, though retaining her interest in that firm, the defendant embarked in another business with one Apfelbaum under the style of Pike & Apfelbaum and there, also, she secured two-thirds of the profits, leaving to Apfelbaum the remaining one-third. She then made a separate agreement with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration of PickerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Walter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Máquez v. Junta Insular de EleccionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1930
  4. Márquez v. Insular Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API