Chittenden v. Rogers

The principal facts in this case are identical with those in the preceding chancery cause between the same parties, so far as the judgments, executions and sales under them are concerned.

When the bill in chancery was dismissed for want of equity, “the plaintiffs in error in their three cases joined in a motion for an order requiring the clerk of the court below to make out a list of all the judgments rendered against the defendants therein at the term of the court, to which the writ of attachment was issued and made returnable, in cause Ho. 20,879, wherein Simeon B. Chittenden et al. are…