Crisfield v. Neal
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Marion District Court. Action by Neal and another against Crisfield, to recover $525 with interest. Judgment for plaintiffs at the June Term, 1884. The defendant brings the case here. The opinion states the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by G. W. Neal and N. Matthews against E. S. Crisfield, to recover $525 and interest. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for $548.90 and costs. The defendant brings the case to this court for review.
It appears that ou September 22, 1882, Henry Barrows, of Marion county, Kansas, owned 180 head of Merino and Cotswold sheep. On that day he mortgaged, or attempted to mortgage them to the plaintiffs, G. W. Neal and N.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beekman v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Leavenworth, Lawrence & Galveston Rld. v. Comm'rs of Douglas CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Westervelt v. PinckneyNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Minor v. HerrifordIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Chittenden v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- School District No. 3 v. Western Tube Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Alferitz v. IngallsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Emick v. SwaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Waggoner v. OurslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Lyeth v. GriffisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.