State v. Reilly
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Under an indictment charging defendant Avith driving a motor vehicle upon the public higlrway Avhile intoxicated, a verdict of guilty was rendered. Defendant moved for a new trial. The motion Avas denied, and he appeals.
It is claimed that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. We deem it ample. The state shoAved that on August 30, 1930, at about 8:30 p. m. defendant and his wife left their home at 3327 Emerson avenue north in Minneapolis, drove to the home of Mr. Keene, 3734 Fremont avenue north, parking their automobile in front of the house headed north. When they arrived,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. ShtemmeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State v. MuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. GlazerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WoffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. GregoriousUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. GregoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1932