Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 18PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Williams (Benjamin), J., presiding. Harry A. Morris presented his first annual account as administrator of the estate of James C. Taylor, deceased. The account was allowed in the probate court, and Henry B. Taylor and William P. Taylor appealed to the circuit court. Judgment sustaining probate order on a directed verdict. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). We shall consider the items involved under three heads:(1) The deposit of $8,542.28.(2) The deposit of $1,802.50.(3) The automobile and launch.

*500At the close of the appellants’ testimony a verdict was directed for the defendant upon all of these items and the main questions in the case revolve around the correctness of these rulings.

1. Section 3, Act No. 248, Public Acts 1909 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 8040), provides:

“When a deposit shall be made in any bank or trust company by any person in the name of such depositor or any other person, and in form to be paid to either…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bloss v. SchreiterMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Negaunee National Bank v. Le BeauMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ludwig v. BrunerMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People's State Bank v. Miller's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Powell v. PennockMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Van't Hof v. JemisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Jacques v. JacquesMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Esling v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Equitable & Central Trust Co. v. ZdziebkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API