Bloss v. Schreiter
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Codd, J. George Bloss presented his final account as executor of the will of Charles Rehfeld, deceased. The account was disallowed in part by the probate court, and the executor appealed to the circuit court. Judgment allowing the account in full on a directed verdict. Arthur E. Schreiter, a residuary legatee, brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
In this case the deceased, Charles Rehfeld, on August 5, 1913, deposited in the Mt. Clemens Savings Bank the sum of $2,000 to the credit of *250“Charles Rehfeld or George Bloss or either or the survivor.” On February 27, 1915, the deceased made a last will and testament by the terms of which, after a number of specific bequests, he devised and bequeathed the residue of his estate to George Bloss and Arthur E. Schreiter, two-thirds to Bloss, and one-third to Schreiter. Shortly thereafter Rehfeld died. Bloss, who was named executor in the will, took possession of the estate and the evidences…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clary v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Negaunee National Bank v. Le BeauMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- McElroy v. Albany Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Bonnette v. MolloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Commerce Trust Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- In Re Edwards' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- O'Brien v. BieggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Benzon v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.