Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Mitchell

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding Lucy D. Mitchell $5,015.88 in damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident.

The dispositive issue presented on this appeal is stated as follows: “Is the ‘physical contact’ requirement in the ‘hit and run’ clause of the uninsured motorist provision of State Farm’s automobile liability policy in conflict with KRS 304.20-020?”

An automobile being driven by Timothy Moran crossed the grass median on Highway 1-65 and struck the automobile of Lucy D. Mitchell. Moran testified that a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Jett v. DoeKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Veronica Louthian v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Milam v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Masler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Burton v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Belcher v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. ArnoldKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API