Legal Opinion

Brown v. Carey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1892No. Appeal, No. 209PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 209, Oct. T., 1890, by plaintiff, Henry Brown, from judgment of C. P. Jefferson Co., Sept. T., 1888, No. 818, on verdict for defendant, John F. Carey. Ejectment. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 209, Oct. T., 1890, by plaintiff, Henry Brown, from judgment of C. P. Jefferson Co., Sept. T., 1888, No. 818, on verdict for defendant, John F. Carey. Ejectment. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Plaintiff’s second point, refused on the trial by White, P. J., specially presiding, was : “ That under all the evidence in the case the verdict of the jury should be for the plaintiff.” [4] Plaintiff’s seventh point and the answer thereto were as follows : “ 7 fch. That there is no sufficient evidence to submit to the jury of a mistake in the name of the vendee in the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice McCollum,

This is an action of ejectment brought by Henry Brown, appellant, against John F. Carey, appellee, for fifty acres of land in Bell township, Jefferson county. The appellant claims title to the land under a deed from John Wilson & Son, who purchased it at a sheriff’s sale on a judgment and execution against *137the appellee. The sale to Wilson & Son was on Dec. 11,1878, and the sheriff’s deed to them was delivered on Feb. 20,1879. The judgment on which the sale was made was entered on Dec. 1, 1868, and the lien of it was continued by amicable revivals. Wilson & Son…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. StierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Jack v. KintzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Rudolph v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API