Legal Opinion

Woody v. Marberry

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2006No. 05-1403UnpublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

R. GUY COLE, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Pro se Petitioner-Appellant Thomas Franklin Woody filed a habeas petition in the judicial district in which he was incarcerated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court determined that, while a portion of Woody’s petition properly sought relief under § 2241, Woody raised claims that should have been brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court concluded that 1) relief under § 2241 was improper because the Bureau of Prisons did not err in calculating Woody’s sentence and that Woody had not shown that the remedy under § 2255 was inadequate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. PetermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Julio E. Roman v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dutton v. U.S. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
  2. Stevenson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  3. Baker v. Bensalz Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. Baker v. Bensalz Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Darrell Hunt v. Eric RardinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API