Woody v. Marberry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
R. GUY COLE, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Pro se Petitioner-Appellant Thomas Franklin Woody filed a habeas petition in the judicial district in which he was incarcerated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court determined that, while a portion of Woody’s petition properly sought relief under § 2241, Woody raised claims that should have been brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court concluded that 1) relief under § 2241 was improper because the Bureau of Prisons did not err in calculating Woody’s sentence and that Woody had not shown that the remedy under § 2255 was inadequate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. PetermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Julio E. Roman v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dutton v. U.S. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Stevenson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Baker v. Bensalz Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Baker v. Bensalz Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Darrell Hunt v. Eric RardinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.