Legal Opinion

Jordan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 30, 1953No. 11682_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.

For many years the procedure to be followed by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in determining an accused person’s mental competence to stand trial was prescribed by a statute originally enacted March 3, 1901, 31 Stat. 1340, ch. 854, § 927, which, as amended April 14, 1906, 34 Stat. 113, ch. 1624, and July 2, 1945, 59 Stat. 311, ch. 217, appears as § 24-301 in the 1951 edition of the District of Columbia Code. 1 There was no statutory procedure, however, to be followed by the other federal courts of the nation in determining such a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. JordanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
  3. Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913
  4. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. George T. Jordan v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia, George T. Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Jim B. Edmonds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. In Re HughesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
  4. Myers v. HollisterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  5. Broden v. BowlesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API