Legal Opinion
Broden v. Bowles
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 19, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 3307-62PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEECH, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion to quash service of process upon a third-party defendant made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 4(f) as amended January 21, 1963, effective July 1, 1963. That rule provides in pertinent part:
“* * * persons who are brought in as parties pursuant to * * * Rule 14 [third-party practice] * * may be served in the manner stated in paragraphs (1)—(6) of subdivision (d) of this rule at all places outside the state but within the United States that are not more than 100 miles from the place in which the action is commenced, * * * ”.
A Deputy United…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Louisville, Cincinnati, & Charleston Rail-Road v. LetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Elkhart v. MiddletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Vogel v. Tenneco Oil CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- MALONEY CONCRETE COMPANY v. DC Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1964