Legal Opinion

State v. . Bowman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Qouncill, J., at September Term, 1909, of ALEXANDER. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbe defendants were indicted for tbe murder of John Hafer, and were convicted of murder in tbe second degree. They appealed from tbe judgment rendered upon tbe verdict. There are thirty-four exceptions in tbe record, but we think they can all be reduced, substantially, to one or two questions which require consideration. Tbe evidence tends to show that, .on tbe day tbe homicide was committed, tbe deceased and several other persons bad assembled in tbe woods for tbe purpose of fighting chickens, and while they were thus assembled defendant Propst and tbe deceased exchanged some angry words,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chaffin v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. State v. Munn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. . MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. State v. . KnottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. State v. MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. State v. LambeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API