Morris v. Sequa Corp.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, Chief Judge.
This case is currently before the court on plaintiffs Motion to Quash Defendant’s Subpoenas. (Doc. 12.)1 The ease is also before the court on defendant’s Motion to Compel. (Doe. 16 at 8-9.) For the reasons discussed below, the court finds that plaintiffs Motion to Quash Defendant’s Subpoenas, (doc. 12), is due to be granted in part and denied in part, or is moot, and defendant’s Motion to Compel, (doc. 16 at 8-9), is due to be granted.
I. MOTION TO QUASH
Plaintiff is a former employee of defendant. (Doc. 1 ¶ 12.) Plaintiff began…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lynda Sue Hancock v. Richard M. Hobbs, City of MariettaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Florida Media, Inc. v. World Publications, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heilman v. WaldronDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Briggs v. AdelDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Crab Stop Bar and Seafood Grill, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023