Legal Opinion

Parker v. Spear

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion to vacate execution against the person.

1Opinion of the CourtArnoux, J.

— Under the old Code an attorney was regarded as the equitable assignee of the judgment to the extent of his claim for services. The payment thereof he had a right to enforce by execution, if he had a lien (Haight agt. Holcomb, 16 How., 160). If the judgment were for costs, that carried notice of itself on the attorney’s lien, and payment to the party was wrongful (McGregor agt. Comstock, 28 N. Y., 237 ; Marshall agt. Meech, 51 N. Y., 140).

Even where a judgment had not been obtained, a settlejment between the parties without notice was not permitted to deprive the attorney of his right to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Stuart v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. McGregor v. . ComstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  4. Lownsdale v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. Catlin v. . Adirondack CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex parte BergmanNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Winton v. KnottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Losaw v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Knapp v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Ritterman v. RopesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API