Ex parte Bergman
Nevada Supreme Court
Hearing upon habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By Hawley, C. J.:
On the eighteenth clay of April, 1883, R. W. Russell commenced an action in the district court of Washoe county against petitioner, William Bergman, to recover damages for malpractice as a physician, and on the thirtieth day of July, 1883, recovered a judgment against him for the sum of three thousand dollars, with interest and costs. • Thereafter the said Russell commenced another action, setting forth the judgment by him obtained, and, as matter entitling him to a judgment against the person of petitioner, upon the ground of fraud, alleged, among other things, that on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- McCool v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Ex parte WinstonNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Moore v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Ex parte BeattyNew York Supreme Court · 1834
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex parte KairNevada Supreme Court · 1905
- Ex parte TaniNevada Supreme Court · 1907
- Ex Parte OhlNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- Ex Parte SheplyNevada Supreme Court · 1949
- United States ex rel. Deimel v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.