State v. Washington
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
BUTTLER, J.,
specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.
While I agree with the majority that this conviction must be reversed because of the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Gilbert, 282 Or 309, 577 P2d 939 (1978), I do not agree with the majority’s reluctant compliance with that decision, and therefore specially concur in that portion of the opinion. With respect to the majority’s holding under the heading "$5,000 and the Picture,” I disagree, and because the evidentiary question remains important on retrial, I register my dissent.
First, the area of general agrément: Gilbert…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ManriqueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978