Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Eischen
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 28, 2024No. 0:24-cv-00027Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Matthew Hernandez, Case No. 24-cv-27 (KMM/DLM) Petitioner, v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischen, FPC Duluth, Warden, Respondent. Before the Court is Matthew Hernandez’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1.) In his petition, Mr. Hernandez challenges the Federal Bureau of Prison’s (“BOP”) calculation of his First Step Act (“FSA”) time credits (“FTCs”) toward an earlier transfer to a Residential Reentry Center (“RRC”) or home confinement. (Id. at 1, 4.) The petition comes before the Court for review under Rule 4…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Addones Spencer v. Anthony HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Riley v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Inmate 115235, C.A. Kruger v. Robert EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.