Legal Opinion
Inmate 115235, C.A. Kruger v. Robert Erickson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1996No. 95-2714PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Per curiam
Clark Kruger is serving a twenty-year sentence for kidnapping and criminal sexual conduct. Under Minnesota law, all inmates convicted of certain sexual offenses are required to submit a blood sample for placement in a DNA databank. See Minn.Stat. § 609.3461. Over his objection, prison officials took Kruger’s blood sample for DNA analysis. Kruger then brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for money damages and injunctive relief in state court, which was decided against him on a summary judgment motion. The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling in an unpublished order, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Shaker Aamer v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Addones Spencer v. Anthony HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Carlos Poree v. Kandy CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Landry v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- In re D.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.