Legal Opinion

Light v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided September 27, 1990No. Claim No. 77233PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edwin Margolis, J.

Claimants’ motion for an order to compel the production of certain documents raises the issue of the scope of 23 USC § 409 in protecting records and data compiled for the purpose of safety planning on State highways. Section 409 reads as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled for the purpose of identifying!;,] evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 152 of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. Claspill v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Dattmore v. Eagan Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Indiana Department of Transportation, Division of Railroads v. OvertonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pierce County v. GuillenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Palacios v. Louisiana and Delta RR Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. Odis Robertson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Harrison v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Guillen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API