Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Ogle

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1982No. Civ. 2978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a fraudulent concealment case.

By a count in their complaint, the Ogles contended that, when they purchased a house and lot from Mrs. Blankenship, she failed to disclose to them that the residence's sewage system was inadequate, that she was under a duty to disclose that information but that she fraudulently withheld such facts from the Ogles.

The jury trial evidence revealed the following facts as viewed in their most favorable light to the Ogles' cause. When Mrs. Blankenship purchased the lot from Hudgins, Mrs. Hudgins remarked that the lot was too small for a house and septic system.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ray v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Harrell v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Brasher v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Cashion v. AhmadiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Ex Parte NixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harlan v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Lee v. United Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Barnes v. BarnhartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Keeler v. ChastangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Wooldridge v. RoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API