Legal Opinion

Swital v. Real Estate Commissioner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1953No. Civ. 19305PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Petitioner was a duly licensed real estate broker, maintaining offices in the cities of Glendale and Los Angeles. In January, 1952, an accusation was filed by a deputy real estate commissioner charging that on or about October 17, 1951, and thereafter petitioner “did wilfully use the term ‘realtor’ without legal right so to do; that such illegal use consisted of maintaining a sign, advertising board and window name-plate with the word ‘realtor’ immediately following respondent’s [petitioner’s] name”; that such action was in violation of section 10177(e), Business and Professions Code. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ellis v. American Federation of LaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola De Beneficencia MutuaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Smith v. Kern County Medical Assn.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Von Arx v. San Francisco Gruetli VereinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ezekial v. WinkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ascherman v. San Francisco Medical SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Bernstein v. Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API