Legal Opinion

Braun v. St. Pius X Parish

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 2011No. Case 09-CV-779-GKF-TLWPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #44) of the plaintiff Martha Lou Braun (“Braun”), and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #47) of defendants St. Pius X Parish, St. Pius X, and Matthew Vereecke. The court evaluates the merits of these cross-motions separately.

A motion for summary judgment shall be granted “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fratello v. Roman Catholic ArchdioceseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Boydston v. Mercy Hospital Ardmore IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Cochran v. SSM-SLUH, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
  4. Conway v. Mercy Hospital St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
  5. Jacobs v. Mercy HealthDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API