Braun v. St. Pius X Parish
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #44) of the plaintiff Martha Lou Braun (“Braun”), and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #47) of defendants St. Pius X Parish, St. Pius X, and Matthew Vereecke. The court evaluates the merits of these cross-motions separately.
A motion for summary judgment shall be granted “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fratello v. Roman Catholic ArchdioceseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Boydston v. Mercy Hospital Ardmore IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Cochran v. SSM-SLUH, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
- Conway v. Mercy Hospital St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
- Jacobs v. Mercy HealthDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024