Legal Opinion

Holm v. Holm

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1947No. 30076PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought .suit for divorce from the defendant. By cross-complaint defendant sought similar relief. Upon a trial before the court, an interlocutory order was entered granting a divorce to the defendant, making a property division between the parties, and requiring plaintiff to provide funds for the support of their minor children. Plaintiff appealed from only that portion of the order relating to the amount and terms of the property award to the defendant.

Appellant, Fred A. Holm, and respondent, Edna B. Holm, intermarried January 9, 1926. Two children were born of the union: one, a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mapes v. MapesWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Nielsen v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Beffa v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Luithle v. LuithleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. McNary v. McNaryWashington Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Berol v. BerolWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Rehak v. RehakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. In the Matter of Marriage of ShannonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. High v. HighWashington Supreme Court · 1953

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API