Providence Park, Inc. v. Mobile City Planning Commission
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1DissentMurdock, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s reversal of the trial court’s judgment; I would affirm the trial court’s denial of Providence Park’s petition for a writ of mandamus.
A petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus must demonstrate, among other things, “a clear legal right to the relief sought.” Alabama Dep’t of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. State, 718 So.2d 74, 75 (Ala.Civ.App.1998). This court also has held that “in an appeal from the trial court’s denial of a petition for a writ of mandamus, [we] must indulge all reasonable presumptions favoring the correctness of the judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Ex Parte City of Fairhope & Bd. of AdjustmentsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Frazer v. TysonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990