Legal Opinion

McDermott v. McDermott

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 11, 1999No. 98-1169Published

1Opinion of the Court

986 S.W.2d 843 (1999)

336 Ark. 557

Harry McDERMOTT, Appellant,

v.

Rhonda McDERMOTT, Appellee.

No. 98-1169.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 11, 1999.

Lee Linzay, Fayetteville, for appellant.

Thomas J. Olmstead, Thomas B. Burke, Fayetteville, for appellee.

IMBER, Justice.

In this divorce case the central issue is whether an attorney's contingency-fee agreements entered into during marriage are marital property under Ark.Code Ann. § 9-12-315 (Repl.1998). The appellant, Mr. Harry McDermott, contends the trial court erred when it declared that certain contingency-fee agreements secured in conjunction with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mason v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Sweeney v. SweeneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API