Legal Opinion
Brown v. Rose
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided January 18, 1973No. Civ. A. Nos. 2971, 2972Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
A writ of habeas corpus was granted in each of these proceedings, when the respondent failed to make timely response to respective orders therein to show cause why the writ should not issue. See memorandum opinion and order herein of December 29, 1972. On January 5, 1973, the respondent moved that the writs be discharged because of the failure of each respective petitioner to exhaust available state remedies. It is contended that the questions here presented had not been presented to, and ruled upon, by the courts of Tennessee.
In civil action…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wade v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Thompson v. TahashDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Donnell v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969