Burst v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Defendants She'll Oil Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., and Texaco, Inc. move to exclude plaintiffs expert, Richard Miller.1 Because the Court finds that Miller’s methodology -for calculating Mr. Burst’s benzene exposure is unreliable, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motion and excludes the testimony of Miller.
1. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Yolande Burst filed this products liability action against defendants Shell, Chevron- (as successor to Gulf Oil Corporation), and Texaco.2 She alleges that her late husband, Bernard Burst, Jr., worked at various Shell Oil,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gonsoulin v. Beta USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025