Cherenzia v. Lynch
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
This is a fish story of a legal sort. A state statute bars any person from using a self-contained underwater breathing apparatus (SCUBA) to harvest shellfish at four named coastal ponds in the state. G.L. 1956 § 20-6-30, as enacted by P.L.2001, ch. 412, § 1. Dangling their constitutionally protected “rights of fishery, and the privileges of the shore,” R.I. Const., art. 1, sec. 17, before a Superior Court motion justice, the named plaintiffs — all of whom were commercial fishermen (hereinafter, the fishermen) — tried to hook this anti-SCUBA statute on various state…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Pawtucket v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
- Boucher v. SayeedSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Medeiros v. Atlantic States MariCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- East Bay Community Development Corp. v. Zoning Board of Review of the Town of BarringtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- State v. GermaneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- In Re Request for Advisory Opinion From the House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Paul Oden v. Carl Schwartz, M.D.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.