Legal Opinion

Herbst v. Givaudan Flavors Corp.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided September 20, 2018No. C 17-4008-MWBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARK W. BENNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION...1008

II. LEGAL ANALYSIS...1009

A. Standards For Summary Judgment...1009

B. Governing Law...1010

C. Discussion...1012

III. CONCLUSION...1015

I. INTRODUCTION

In this case, plaintiff Marlin Herbst alleges that he suffers from bronchiolitis obliterans (aka "popcorn lung") and/or other lung or respiratory diseases or impairments from working with butter flavorings containing diacetyl at the American Popcorn Company (APC ) plant in Sioux City, Iowa, between 1991 and August 1993. On January 27, 2017, Herbst brought products liability…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Resideo Technologies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API