Legal Opinion

Peluck v. Pacific MacHine & Blacksmith Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action under the Employers’ Liability Act to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff while employed by defendant in the installation of two new gear wheels in a forty-eight-inch lathe machine.

The large gear wheel, which was attached to the face plate, or disk, of the lathe, was thirty-five inches in diameter and the smaller gear or pinion wheel which meshed in the large wheel was six inches in diameter. After these new gear wheels had been installed and the power was applied, it developed that the teeth of the wheels did not properly mesh,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Woods v. WikstromOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Yovovich v. Falls City Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Foster v. University Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pioneer Resources, LLC v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Broad v. Kelly's Olympian Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ferretti v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Murray v. LaugsandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API