O'Reilly-Morshead v. O'Reilly-Morshead
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard A. Dollinger, J.
“I do”—a one-letter overused personal pronoun and two-letter auxiliary verb—is uttered in many contexts. Separated, even by a comma, the two words may be all but innocuous. When uttered as a response to a question in a certain context, the words marry a couple, not only to each other, but to a cascade of rights and responsibilities. In this matter, a couple was united in a civil union in Vermont, but lived the majority of their marriage in New York. Now, one spouse asks this court to distribute “civil union” assets by applying the equitable…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Morone v. MoroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.