Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'DONNELL v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1962No. 38,366Published

1DissentKnutson, Chief Justice

I cannot agree with the majority opinion. In the first place, the opinion is based on decisions of this and other courts that do not support the conclusions arrived at. The cases cited fall largely into two categories, namely, those in which the policy itself required some affirmative act on the part of the insurer before the period limited for bringing an action would commence to run or those in which the insurer had done something to lull the insured into deferring the commencement of action, such as negotiating for a settlement or carrying on efforts at an adjustment. This case does not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Donaldson v. Chase Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Engstrom v. FARMERS & BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Dechter v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API