Legal Opinion
Doe v. Roblox Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 9, 2022No. 3:21-cv-03943Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 3:21-cv-03943-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. AND STRIKE 10 ROBLOX CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendant. 11 12 13 Defendant Roblox Corporation (“Roblox”) owns and operates an online “metaverse” in 14 which users control avatars of themselves. Users can purchase an in-game currency and spend it 15 on virtual items for their avatars, some of which are generated by other users. Plaintiff Jane Doe, 16 who is a minor, alleges that Roblox incentivizes its users—who are mostly minors—to…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.