Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Hammer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1896No. 2294PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Skagit County. —Hon. Henry McBride, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*316The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This case involves the constitutionality of the act providing for the establishment of diking districts. (Laws 1895, p. 304.) The lower court sustained the act, and this appeal was taken.

It is first contended that the act is in violation of § 9, art. 7, of the constitution, which reads as follows :

“ The legislature may vest the corporate authorities of cities, towns, and villages with power to make local improvements by special assessment, or by special taxation of property benefited. For all corporate purposes, all municipal corporations may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cass v. DicksWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Board of Directors v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Updike v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State ex rel. Abbott v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Rolph v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API