Legal Opinion

Connecticut College for Women v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 19, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Applications for the appointment of appraisers to estimate damages arising from the taking of land for the purposes of the plaintiff as an educational corporation, brought to and heard together by the Hon. Joel H. Reed, a judge of the Superior Court, who, after a full hearing, appointed appraisers, from which action the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendants by their plea in abatement to the jurisdiction attempted to raise the question of Judge Reed’s authority to act in this matter while the Superior Court was in session for criminal business, in the county where the action arose.

The statute permits an application of this kind to be brought before a judge of the Superior Court only when that court is not in session within the county. It (General Statutes, § 4106) provides that the application may be preferred to the Superior Court held in the county, “or, if said court is not in session, to either judge thereof.” This being a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eustis v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Harrison v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Town of West Hartford v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. State v. FaheySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Town of East Haven v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. City of Chicago v. Jewish Consumptives Relief SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API