Legal Opinion

United States v. Rupert

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 30, 1987No. ACMR 8700720PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMKEWICZ, Senior Judge:

On 19 March 1987, appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of larceny of various items of U.S. Army property of an aggregate value in excess of $100.00 during a seventeen month period, alleged in one specification of a charge in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1982). He was sen-*532fenced to reduction to the grade of Private E-l, forfeiture of $300.00 pay per month for nine months, confinement for nine months, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence.

Before this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. TamasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. PooleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. MenschUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. HardingArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  2. United States v. ChristensenArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. PabonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. Private E2 ALVIN C. ENDSLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  5. United States v. CampbellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API