Legal Opinion

Berger v. Freeman Tribune Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 19, 1906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court.— IIon. J. II. Richard, Judge. Action for libel. Defense, justification, privilege, and a pleading of facts in mitigation. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

The alleged libel (Exhibit A) reads as follows:

Her Husband Failed to Die.

Gypsy Fortune Teller Alleged to Have Said E. M. Berger-

Would Die and Wife Would Wed Rich Man — Hence

Divorce is Postponed.

Mrs. E. M. Berger, who yesterday had an information sworn out against her husband, charging him with having threatened her life, withdrew it when the case came on for trial last evening before Justice Knowles. It was withdrawn for the reason that Berger agreed to leave the city and have nothing more to do with his wife. At the last term of the District Court Mrs. Berger filed an application for divorce…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McAllister v. Detroit Free Press Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Hayes v. Press Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Hinkle v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  5. Barr v. HackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Vinson v. Linn-Mar Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Vojak v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Shaw Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. Des Moines Dress ClubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Salinger v. CowlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API