Legal Opinion

Security Trust and Savings Bank v. Reed

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 8, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In the absence of fraud or mistake defenses of this nature are wholly dependent upon the covenants contained in the deed of conveyance. When the deed from complainant to defendant contains a covenant against encumbrances the mortgagor will be entitled to a deduction for prior encumbrances. This is because in such circumstances that covenant may be deemed already broken when made and this court may appropriately determine an issue of that nature. When the deed contains a covenant of title this court will not undertake to adjudicate an issue of title to determine whether the covenant has been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. OdensonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  2. Kuhnen v. ParkerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
  3. Ratkewicz v. KaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Emery v. HansenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API