United States v. Goo
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, Judge.
On February 9, 1950, the defendant, represented by two attorneys, Harry Hewitt, Esq., and John Alexander, Esq., of the firm «of Hewitt & Alexander, appeared in Court, and when the Government announced its ■desire to file three felony charges against the defendant in the form of an information the defendant waived his constitutional right and consented to the filing of the charges in that form.
Immediately thereafter defense counsel informed the Court that the defendant waived reading of the information, and was ready to plead. (As will appear infra, the defendant and his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Taylor v. United States. Taylor v. Squier, Warden (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. SearleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
3Cited by9 opinions
- Panter v. Marshall Field & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- United States v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Farr v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
- Danning v. Donovan (In Re Carter)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Sherman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.