Legal Opinion
Danning v. Donovan (In Re Carter)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided July 9, 1986No. Bankruptcy No. SA 83-05401 RP, Adv. No. SA 85-0368 RPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH G. PAGTER, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Co-trustees’ motion to compel production of documents and answers to deposition questions came on regularly for hearing on April 21, 1986. Michael Goldstein appeared on behalf of movants. Alan Tip-pie appeared on behalf of respondents. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court held that the real party in interest, Thomas D. Carter (“Carter”), was entitled to respond to the motion, and that the Co-trustees were entitled to reply to Carter’s response. Subsequent to receipt of Carter’s response and the Co-trustees’ reply, the matter was taken under…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Foster v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Perrigo Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- In Re FairbanksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
- In Re FosterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.