Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1988No. Docket Nos. B017130, B017131PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, Acting P. J.

Following the rendition of final judgment in this protracted school desegregation case, five separate interveners, each allegedly representing widely divergent viewpoints, sought an award of fees and costs pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, 1 the so-called “private attorney general” doctrine, for their participation in the remedial phase of the action. The trial court denied the award and this consolidated appeal by four of the interveners follows. We affirm.

The history of this case, encompassing more than two decades of costly and highly complex…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Hewlett v. Squaw Valley Ski Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Levy v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. a Free Pregnancy CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API