Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 7, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

2Per curiam

Counsel assigned to represent an indigent defendant charged with entering with intent to steal obtained an order authorizing him to retain a toxicologist at the expense of the county. The treasurer of the county appealed, and we certified the appeal before argument in the Appellate Division.

Appellant contends the trial court could not make the order in question because no rule of court authorized it. As we have this day held in State v. Rush, 46 N. J. 399 (1966), no rule was needed to that end.

The other point made is that the services of a toxicologist…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  2. Clark v. DegnanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. State v. ManningNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. State v. RyanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API