Legal Opinion
State v. Manning
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 21, 1989PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
234 N.J. Super. 147 (1989)
560 A.2d 693
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS WILLIAM MANNING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 11, 1989.
Decided June 21, 1989.
Before Judges ANTELL, DREIER and BROCHIN.
Ronald L. Kuby and William M. Kunstler, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Ronald L. Kuby, William M. Kunstler and Elizabeth O'Connor Tomlinson, on the brief).
Boris Moczula, Deputy Attorney General argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. SchoonmakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WoolSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- State v. LandgrafNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In re CannadySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.