Legal Opinion

Kirkendall v. Kirkendall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 We must determine whether the trial court was correct to award primary physical custody of Adan Kirkendall to his father. We affirm.

*1263 Facts

¶ 2 Mother and father were married in May of 1996. Out of this marriage a child was born. This child, named Aidan, is now six years old. Aidan has lived his entire life in or around Dallastown, Pennsylvania.

¶ 3 After Aidan was born and for about three-and-a-half years afterwards, mother worked part time as a therapist in order to spend more time with and care for Aidan. Father at that time was working long hours as a chef.

¶ 4…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gruber v. GruberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. McMillen v. McMillenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Charles v. StehlikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. In Re DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. M.J.M. v. M.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Collins v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. S.J.S. v. M.J.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Landis v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Johnson v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API