Kirkendall v. Kirkendall
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
OLSZEWSKI, J.:
¶ 1 We must determine whether the trial court was correct to award primary physical custody of Adan Kirkendall to his father. We affirm.
*1263 Facts
¶ 2 Mother and father were married in May of 1996. Out of this marriage a child was born. This child, named Aidan, is now six years old. Aidan has lived his entire life in or around Dallastown, Pennsylvania.
¶ 3 After Aidan was born and for about three-and-a-half years afterwards, mother worked part time as a therapist in order to spend more time with and care for Aidan. Father at that time was working long hours as a chef.
¶ 4…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gruber v. GruberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- McMillen v. McMillenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Charles v. StehlikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- M.J.M. v. M.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Collins v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- S.J.S. v. M.J.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Landis v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Johnson v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.