Legal Opinion

Charles v. Stehlik

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2000No. 11 W.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

This is a custody matter. The question at issue is whether the lower courts properly determined that Randall Charles (“Appellee”), who is the step-parent of the child in question, should have primary custody rather than Richard Stehlik (“Appellant”), who is the child’s biological father. After careful review of this matter, we affirm.

Appellant and Linda Bauer (“Mother”) were married on December 6,1986. A son, who was named Matthew, was born to Appellant and Mother on March 3, 1989; this was the only child resulting from this marriage. In August of 1989, a few months…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Ellerbe v. HooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Albright v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. FettersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Petersen v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Watkins v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. Butler v. IllesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. V.B. v. J.E.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API