Smith v. DELAWARE FIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant, Delaware First Federal Credit Union’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (D.I.5). For the reasons discussed the Motion will be granted.
I. Background
The following facts are alleged in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (D.I.4). On December 28, 2004, Plaintiffs filed documents with Defendant to prevent money being removed from their banking account through any debit card transaction submitted by Hertz Corporation. Defendant assured Plaintiffs that they had flagged Plaintiffs’ account and that no money…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foster v. Jeep Country Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Sowe v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- The Loan Source Inc. v. Newity LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023