Gilbreath v. East Arkansas Planning & Development District, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ROY, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
In this action, which was tried to the court sitting without a jury on March 12, 1979, the plaintiff, William J. Gilbreath, challenges the constitutional propriety of the termination of his employment with the East Arkansas Planning and Development District. The following findings of fact and conclusions of law are submitted as the court’s memorandum of decision in accordance with the provisions of Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The plaintiff’s complaint and amended complaint state a claim for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brockell v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Grosz v. State of Ind.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
- Payne v. BallardDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1984
- Brockell v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Gilbreath v. EAST ARK. PLANNING & DEVEL. DIST.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.